11-06-2018, 06:51 AM | #1 |
New Member
21
Rep 21
Posts |
Retrofit HU_ENTRY - HU_NBT_EVO (F20)
Hello,
I am doing a retrofit HU_ENTRY to HU_NBT_EVO on my F20 from 01/2012. I bought all the necessary equipment to realize this retrofit but unfortunately I have an error while programming the ECU (HU_NBT2) with Esys. Here is the error: [HU_NBT2 - 63 - cafd_00001ef6-006_020_007] Transaction type: cdDeploy; Message: TA started MCDDiagService<id=62649, job=com.bmw.psdz.jobs.uds.MCD3_PerformECUCoding, service=WDBI_PLAIN - WriteDataByIdentifier with unlimited Data-ID (plain hex value), description=error: negative response : requestOutOfRange, link=HU_NBT2_63_ETHERNET> [HU_NBT2 - 63 - cafd_00001ef6-006_020_007] Transaction type: cdDeploy; Message: TA finished [HU_NBT2 - 63] There was an error during TAL execution, please check the log files. [HU_NBT2 - 63] - [Exception - HU_NBT2 - 63] job failed with negative response error: code: service returned global negative response description: Service WDBI_PLAIN returned a negative response with response code requestOutOfRange; LinkName: HU_NBT2_63_ETHERNET severity: ERROR Do you know why I have this error? For information in the FA (VO) I have: 1) remove 663 2) add 609 3) change 6NH to 6NS I also change the production date of the car from "1111" to "1116". Thank you in advance for any help. Best regards, Hugo |
11-06-2018, 07:50 AM | #2 |
New Member
21
Rep 21
Posts |
I would like to point out that I do not know the VIN of the donor vehicle.
I'm going to run "Tool32" tonight to try to get a VIN from the donor vehicle so that I can have the headunit FA codes HU_NBT_EVO. Once I have these codes, I enter all the codes of the donor VIN? I also have the message "no signal" on the screen. I guess this is due to the problem of coding ... In addition, the headunit HU_NBT_EVO date of 11/2016, so I change the date of production of my car (FA) on that date, is it correct? |
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2018, 12:00 PM | #5 |
New Member
21
Rep 21
Posts |
So my question is : What are the SALAPA elements that I need to add, delete or modify in my current configuration?
The website "https://www.etkbmw.com/bmw/FR/parts/info/Headunit+High+2/65128780776/appliance" indicates that the headunit reference is compatible with my vehicle (F20 - 118d). |
Appreciate
0
|
11-06-2018, 02:11 PM | #6 |
New Member
21
Rep 21
Posts |
I just found a good topic about that : https://fscmap.com/product/unlock/
Price : 135€ for unlock the NBT EVO, so if I understand, my NBT EVO is lock ? Maybe a solution here : http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?b...o=221381776174 Solution : add 2 options... hum.... Last edited by hugo325; 11-06-2018 at 02:21 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2018, 10:01 AM | #7 |
New Member
21
Rep 21
Posts |
I just found the solution.
So actually it was a problem with the code FA. Some VO codes are not compatible with HU_NBT2. Here are my changes: Delete : 663 (Radio BMW Professional) Delete : 698 (Area-Code 2 for DVD) Delete : 6AA (BMW TeleServices) Delete : 6AB (Control for Teleservices) Add : 609 (Navigation system Professional) Add : 6AE (Teleservices) With this the CADF code goes without problem. But I still have no display on the 8.8 "screen. "No signal" displayed. I have the impression that my screen is not compatible with the HU_NBT_EVO ... For info here is the description of my screen, you think it is compatible with my headunit? BMW LK CID 8.8 Part number : 65509381039 01 Product date : 10/09/2014 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2018, 12:07 PM | #8 |
New Member
21
Rep 21
Posts |
Yes It's worked !!
I changed with parameters into CAFD HU_NBT2 : CID_APIX_MODE = APIX1 CID_COLOR DEPTH = 18 CID_COM_MODE = SPI CID_DISPLAY_RES = 1280_480 CID_DISPLAY_SIZE = 8,8 |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2019, 02:35 PM | #11 |
Private
14
Rep 81
Posts |
Hello Hugo
Nice to see that is worked out. i will be doing the retrofit myself within a couple of days and i have the same opsions as you so i think that this helped a lot. one question. what emulator did u use? Kamal |
Appreciate
0
|
02-01-2019, 11:49 AM | #12 | |
Enlisted Member
3
Rep 47
Posts |
Quote:
I'm having the same issue with CAFD_00001EF6_006_025_206 and wondering if it's a E-Sys or PSdZData version issue. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|