01-23-2017, 03:21 AM | #45695 |
Schmollbraten
12512
Rep 1,985
Posts |
Uuuuh, too much information
__________________
Citizen of ///M - Town, where too much is just right Some say, that my scrotum has its own small gravity field and when Im slowing down that brake lights come on at my buttox |
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 10:39 AM | #45696 |
Lieutenant General
7433
Rep 11,843
Posts
Drives: MY24 G01 AW Msport
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: L.I. NY
|
sup
where's every1? |
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 10:50 AM | #45698 |
Lieutenant General
7433
Rep 11,843
Posts
Drives: MY24 G01 AW Msport
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: L.I. NY
|
same here, a noreaster suppose to hit NY
waiting for it to begin! |
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 11:08 AM | #45699 |
Brigadier General
798
Rep 4,784
Posts |
What's that?
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP |
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 11:34 AM | #45701 |
Brigadier General
798
Rep 4,784
Posts |
Learn something new everyday. I can't say I've ever experienced that before.
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP |
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 11:41 AM | #45702 |
Lieutenant General
7433
Rep 11,843
Posts
Drives: MY24 G01 AW Msport
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: L.I. NY
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 12:08 PM | #45704 | |
is probably out riding.
6058
Rep 2,292
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.photoshop.com
__________________
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. -Charles de Secondat"
|
|
Appreciate
1
PoorLurker1136.50 |
01-23-2017, 12:29 PM | #45705 | |
Banned
7929
Rep 1,923
Posts |
Quote:
I disagree. Given that the definition of photogenic is more or less that someone appears attractive in photographs / video, I do not think you need to see them in person. If they are attractive in a photo, then they are photogenic. Maybe they are an absolutely hideous person in terms of personality and so they are not attractive overall, but they would still be photogenic. Physically, they are attractive. Now I don't have instagram and don't care to get it, so I haven't seen a pic of Biorin or the famous mustache, but I would agree that Instagram and others would only host the best pics available. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 12:31 PM | #45706 | |
Lieutenant
2785
Rep 421
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 12:34 PM | #45707 | |
Lieutenant General
7433
Rep 11,843
Posts
Drives: MY24 G01 AW Msport
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: L.I. NY
|
Quote:
good looks always fades away, its all about personality. like a hot chick with zero persona is fugly |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 12:35 PM | #45708 |
Lieutenant
2785
Rep 421
Posts |
Completely agree. It's like that Cragislist ad (most likely a fake) about a hot woman wondering why she can't get a good guy with decent income, etc. The (most likely fake) response from a man then calls her a depreciating asset whose looks will only fade.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 12:43 PM | #45709 | |
Banned
7929
Rep 1,923
Posts |
Quote:
Definition is "suitable for being photographed especially because of visual appeal" or "tending to look good in photographs" I did not see anything suggesting relativity |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 12:47 PM | #45710 | |
Lieutenant
2785
Rep 421
Posts |
Quote:
You can have lovely features that do not look well in a photograph. I thought this was an interesting discussion. http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=545431 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 01:07 PM | #45711 | |
Banned
7929
Rep 1,923
Posts |
Quote:
If you are an "attractive subject for photography" or have "features that look well in a photograph", then does that not support my original point that you do not need to actually meet the person - it is judged on the photograph alone whether that individual is attractive in that photo (photogenic). Certainly I would agree that you can have lovely features that do not look good in a photograph - but as a result, because you do not look good in a photograph, you would be unphotogenic. I do not think it is a relative position - a person either is, or is not, attractive in photos and is therefore photogenic, or is not. It does not mean that the person is actually attractive in real life - even physically. Someone may photograph well and be attractive in the photo (photogenic), but when you meet him or her, you are surprised to find they are not attractive physically. This does not change the fact that they are photogenic. Now, for those three little words that if uttered from you, would make my day... "You are right" |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 01:36 PM | #45712 | ||
Banned
4202
Rep 216
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
1
Mr Tonka6058.00 |
01-23-2017, 01:52 PM | #45713 | |
Lieutenant
2785
Rep 421
Posts |
Quote:
My argument is this: imagine you see a photo of someone, and find them quite attractive. However, you meet them, and find them to be absolutely breathtaking. While they looked good in the photo, it is incomparable to how they look in real life. I would say that this person is not photogenic. They may be so attractive that even a bad photo of them is appealing when compared to most, but the photograph is still unflattering compared to their true looks. That, to me, is what makes it relative. |
|
Appreciate
1
Axius4202.00 |
01-23-2017, 02:24 PM | #45714 |
Lieutenant General
7433
Rep 11,843
Posts
Drives: MY24 G01 AW Msport
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: L.I. NY
|
|
Appreciate
1
///M Power-Belgium63359.50 |
01-23-2017, 02:43 PM | #45715 | |
is probably out riding.
6058
Rep 2,292
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. -Charles de Secondat"
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2017, 02:46 PM | #45716 |
Lieutenant
2785
Rep 421
Posts |
...and now we're onto PornHub: True Confessions.
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|