05-22-2013, 01:20 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
65
Rep 466
Posts |
No more manual transmission....
Scary title for some isn't it. It is definitely the case for us in Asia. They have stopped importing manual M135i in Taiwan, and there is nothing fully manual in the entire BMW lineup for us. You can get it through individual case with criminal down payment requests for the M3. There is definitely no plan to bring in any manual anymore starting from now for us. Indeed, even almost like 95% of drivers opt for DCT here (I wonder why, not their only car anyways).
In Taiwan if you pick a manual transmission you're consider a car connoisseur/hardcore racer/strange all in one go and sometimes frowned upon. I am wondering is this becoming a widespread phenomenon even in other parts of the world? Manual is not even going to be an option some time in the future, and the people that want it dwindle in number anyways? |
05-22-2013, 02:35 AM | #2 |
Major
282
Rep 1,491
Posts |
Because of the increasingly harsh Euro emissions and fuel economy regs, I suspect it will be very rare to see a manual Euro car, or car made for the Euro market, within the next couple of years
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 02:49 AM | #3 |
Private First Class
55
Rep 139
Posts |
As good as the new auto gearboxes are, I can see the reason for it. In the hunt of lower emissions, a good auto gearbox can be of help rather than increasing the consumption. Especially in Porsches this is clear, when you, here in Norway, now pay less money for a Porsche with their PDK gearbox than with MT. -Simply because of the emissions.
The last news on this front: the new Porsche 991 Turbo/Turbo S is only available with PDK. Worldwide (at least for now, before the enthusiasts start complaining). Wonder why...? |
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 03:23 AM | #4 |
New Member
0
Rep 10
Posts |
I thought the lower emissions from auto boxes were just paper figures, due to the gearboxes being configured for optimum performance exactly within the parameters of the euro norm test?
Has anyone tested similar cars with manual/auto in regular driving conditions and found a noticable difference? |
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 03:35 AM | #5 | |
Brigadier General
266
Rep 3,290
Posts |
Quote:
I am traditionally biased strongly against automatic gearboxes, and have often refused to drive cars unless they have a "real" gearbox. The new ZF transmission in the F20 has dented my opinion about auto boxes significantly. Seems like they have sorted out most issues I hate them for, and I suspect I could actually live with one. Automatic gearboxes used to be number one on my hate list, in front of issues like front wheel drive, diesel engines, open differentials and convertibles. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 04:45 AM | #6 |
Colonel
62
Rep 2,472
Posts |
I could and have lived with an auto (dual clutch job). i;d still rather have the choice though.
When I checked the howmanyleft website which shows the number of f20s registered per quarter in the UK I was stunned to see that manual M135i's were vastly in the minority but in contrast the majority of 125d's registered were manuals. You would think the car classed as the "driver's car" would get more manual orders and the motorway mile munching dervs would nearly all be auto. In saying that i could live with and auto, when I had my DSG equipped car I found it quite novel at first but after a while it felt like a large part of the driving experience had been removed. There is practically no skill to shifting in these things and to me the cliche of feeling like a playstation really did ring true. there is little mechanical connection to the car and with the numb steering that most cars have now it's just not a trend I like. As for better emissions. It's a con. Day to day manual or auto driven in the same manner will be almost identical. It's just a way round the stupid, poorly conceived euro tests/ratings and we are suffering as drivers if it ends up you can't get a manual.
__________________
Daily Golf R
Project Peugeot 205 1.6 GTi |
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 04:49 AM | #7 |
Lieutenant General
1867
Rep 13,043
Posts
Drives: BMW M340I G20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
|
It wouldn't bother me TBH I've never found a large engined car that suits a manual gearbox properly.But agree, it should still be a choice.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 04:55 AM | #8 |
Major
282
Rep 1,491
Posts |
you're on a slippery slope, now I reckon. In a few years, I can see you in a Golf GTD convertible...with DSG!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 05:10 AM | #9 |
Brigadier General
266
Rep 3,290
Posts |
I know. I have already given up naturally aspirated engines and limited slip differentials. I wonder what BMW will take away from me next time. I fear that it could be my beloved clutch pedal.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 09:21 AM | #10 |
Colonel
62
Rep 2,472
Posts |
If my dealer is to be believed in a few years time we will all just be passengers in self driven cars. The thought gives me the fear
__________________
Daily Golf R
Project Peugeot 205 1.6 GTi |
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 02:26 PM | #12 |
Major
112
Rep 1,140
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 02:38 PM | #13 | |
New Member
2
Rep 14
Posts |
Quote:
I used to be a huge fan of MT driving until I tried a DCT M3 & a DKG 335i. It changed my world. Even when I tried the auto 116i , the gearbox felt fantastic. Give it a try... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-22-2013, 06:31 PM | #14 | ||
Major
112
Rep 1,140
Posts |
Quote:
Did twice a 1h30 test drive with the M135i AT. It's very practical, and I'd love to have one for daily commuting. But I'm not buying my M135i for practicality, so I'm sticking to a manual for now... |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 12:55 AM | #15 | |
Major
220
Rep 1,231
Posts |
No you won't
Quote:
Well I can tell you that at 60, motorcycles and fast M-cars are just as appealing and Mercedes automatics, just as boring. You're either a 'pipe and slippers' guy, or you're not. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 01:35 AM | #16 | |
Major
220
Rep 1,231
Posts |
Not so easy
Quote:
Now clearly, for a beginner, an AT is nothing like as challenging to drive as an MT, and the pre-ZF ATs were not rewarding in manual mode, but the latest ZF and DCTs are different kettles of fish entirely. Super-fast, with no sense of torque convertor 'slush' these boxes do not take the edge off an otherwise sporty drive like most current ATs. But they do require a very different driving rhythm compared to an MT and its not something you acquire in 1.5 hours. I've driven around 1200 miles and I'm only just starting to 'get it'. The other thing I'm finding is that its not helpful to drive the ZF in Auto, then flick to manual for a occasional sporty drive. I believe it takes a lot of practice to drive a ZF or DCT optimally, before the timing of up and down shift becomes 2nd nature. I can still drive a stick way more smoothly on a twisting winding B road, but I'm getting there with the ZF. It does however require a lot of driver involvement to readjust completely the driving style and learn the new shift points. IMO, the biggest difference between an MT and AT is that the MT mandates some skill in manipulating gears, whereas the AT has a 'lazy' mode that allows unskilled or disinterested drivers to avoid any thought or involvement in gear shifting. Most ATs don't reward manual shifting, but DCTs and the new ZF can, if the driver puts in the effort to learn how to use one most effectively. Driving a DCT or ZF after an MT is like learning a new language....total immersion gets the best results, but most just end up switching back to English and miss most of the pleasure of learning to communicate in a different language. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 02:27 AM | #18 | |
Brigadier General
266
Rep 3,290
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 03:53 AM | #19 | |
Major
112
Rep 1,140
Posts |
Quote:
If you aren't able to heel-and-toe and experience the rewarding feeling once you get it right, you cannot compare the involvement of driving MT vs AT. All you "AT'ers" have to do is flick a switch. The same involvement for hand-eye-mind-feet coordination for advanced MT driving can never be obtained with AT. If you find it thrilling to learn when to flick the switch with your finger, then try to learn how and when to operate three pedals with two feet at the same time, oh yeah and the stick at the same time as well. I'm not debating if either MT or AT is the better overal choice. But I don't agree when people try to sell AT as being as involving and difficult to learn to get it right as with MT. My next car might well be an AT, and years from now I'll tell my son (now 12 months) that cars used to have three pedals, and I'm sure he's going to ask "how the hell did you operate that?" and I'll explain it and tell about heel-and-toe and I'm sure he will regard that as stone-age technology and mindset. But for the next few years I will enjoy my MT, and then I'll join the rest of you lot |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 07:36 AM | #20 |
Lieutenant
218
Rep 492
Posts |
It just depends on the car and what you want it for. I can't quite fathom wanting an automatic Porsche Cayman for example. Likewise, I don't quite see the rationale of owning a hot hatch with an auto 'box unless you have to share it with a spouse who will only drive automatics. But if I was ordering a family estate car, SUV or luxury car, I'd get an automatic without a doubt.
I laud BMW for offering the 335i MSport Touring (which would make an excellent next car should the need arise) as a manual, but would get the automatic given the car's remit.
__________________
____________________
Current: Macan GTS Previous: 440i GC, M135i, E60 M5, Z1, 330d, 135i, Alfa 156 GTA, Mercedes 500E, Audi S3, Audi A3 quattro, VW Golf GTI 16v |
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 07:48 AM | #21 |
Lieutenant General
1867
Rep 13,043
Posts
Drives: BMW M340I G20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
|
Really? I owned a Cayman S Gen2 and one of the main reasons I only kept it a month was the poor feel to the clutch take up feel.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2013, 08:00 AM | #22 | |
Colonel
62
Rep 2,472
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Daily Golf R
Project Peugeot 205 1.6 GTi |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|