Quote:
Originally Posted by smashhell
However the impressive thing about the M135 is that it cost $10k less than the 1M while being able to achieve similar performance.
|
Seems that what we said about the 1M and M3....
But between the 1M and M135, if these cars are so close in performance it amazes me that a month ago a driver took the M135 to Nordschleife and drove 8:05 BtG on a wet track and the official 1M time with it's pro driver took 8:14 on a dry track? Did the 1M drive a different route or was the M135 so much better or was the M135 driver so much better?